🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

European Momentum

In Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are considering parallel measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM declaring that phones and apps are "robbing our children's childhood". Legislation may be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an similar ban remains "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to pass a bill raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a related move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised guardians to restrict their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory resolution supporting a ban for minors unless guardian approval is given. While it warns of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a solid first step," commented one European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a future ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "based on conclusive research".

Earlier, interest built behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. However, the government committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a girl who was lost after being exposed to disturbing social media material suggests that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to build tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The US: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, action is largely happening at the local level amid federal inaction.

• Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a law restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra time dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws demanding adult authorization for minors to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from certain politicians to mimic Australia's example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of the West, other countries are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, international organizations take a more cautious tone. Unicef has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve user protection.

As this worldwide conversation unfolds, the steps of Australia and its followers demonstrate that policymakers around the world are increasingly prepared to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.